Sign up for PayPal and start accepting credit card payments instantly.

Posisi Favorit Anda Ketika Melakukan Seks Bersama Istri Tercinta Anda?

LATEST HEADLINES:

Monday, January 12, 2009

Movie Review: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button

Ya lumayan nih film ini, lihat aja ratingnya 7 lol.

Reviewed by: Joshua Starnes
Rating:
7 out of 10
Movie Details:
View here

Cast:
Brad Pitt as Benjamin Button
Cate Blanchett as Daisy
Taraji P. Henson as Queenie
Jared Harris as Captain Mike
Tilda Swinton as Elizabeth Abbott
Jason Flemyng as Thomas Button
Mahershalalhashbaz Ali as Tizzy
Julia Ormond as Caroline
Elias Koteas as Monsieur Gteau

Review:
Every decade deserves its "Forrest Gump" I guess. David Fincher's adaptation of a little known (and monumentally depressing) F. Scott Fitzgerald story is this one's. Depending on your point of view, that's either a damning condemnation or just what the doctor ordered.

Benjamin Button (Brad Pitt) is born a prematurely old man, but rather than quickly expiring as everyone expects, he keeps getting bigger and stronger and it soon becomes apparent he's ageing backwards, at which point all connection to the original story ceases. In a piece of none to subtle commentary (and that about sums up the whole film), Benjamin's very freaked father abandons him on the doorstep of one of New Orlean's first retirement homes.

Fitzgerald's story, among other things, was about the oft-made connection between the nature of childhood and old age, and the film version passes no opportunity in doing the same. However, that's as far as Benjamin's condition ever gets insofar as it affects his personality. For the most part it passes unnoticed and only is occasionally commented on. And that's because Benjamin wasn't born an old man, he was just born looking like one, and that shamelessness is reflected in quite a lot of the rest of the film. Part of that is because Fincher and screenwriter Eric Roth are trying to depict Benjamin's circumstances in a realistic world. They're not interested in telling a fairy tale, they want to tell a travelogue. And that's essentially what "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" is. Benjamin is born at the close of World War I, and after a copious amount of time is spent with his youth, pounding in the idea of old childhood (and vice versa), he sets out to make his way in the world.

It is without question a wonderful looking film. Fincher is operating at the peak of his powers here. He's not telling a fairy tale, but he has created a world that's an ideal--be it frozen Russia, an ocean filled with dead bodies, or rural India--which should give you an idea how his film wanders. It's constructed as more of a loose set of vignettes, related through Benjamin's diary (being read in the present day) of different moments. And lots of those moments are fantastic, particularly a nighttime battle between a tugboat and submarine.

The cast is also generally excellent. Pitt has to do some of the hardest work of his career, playing both adult and young Benjamin while lathered in old age makeup, with his head composited onto a doubles body. It's a testament both to Fincher's ability and Pitt's performance that the effect is largely seamless. In fact the performances all around are superb, from Cate Blanchett as the love of Benjamin's life to the various individuals Benjamin meets during his travels. The two real standouts are Tilda Swinton as a lonely diplomat's wife and Jared Harris as a bawdy ship captain who always wanted to be an artist.

The problem is Eric Roth's script, who not coincidentally also wrote "Forrest Gump" (fourteen years ago! has it been that long?). Meandering would be a nice way to put it. He has some pretensions to a novelistic feel, starting with a fable about a clock that runs backwards and various side stories throughout. A lot of them sound good on paper--a meditation on the confluence of events leading up to a car accident--but a lot of them (particularly a recurring image of a humming bird) land with a dull thud. It can be awfully overwrought and the more the film goes on the more obvious it gets.

And did I mention it's long? I don't generally have a problem with long movies, if they keep me engrossed. But "Benjamin Button" feels every minute of its nearly three hour running time, and its impossible not to feel like at least a half an hour could have been lopped off. Especially towards the end when director and writer seem to become impatient with details and reduce the last decades of Benjamin's life to a montage. It feels cheap, especially considering how much time and attention was given to Benjamin's youth. Or maybe it's just because the lyrics to "Even Rocky Had A Montage" wouldn't leave me alone.

By following the length of Benjamin's life (and then some), Fincher is able to showcase all the different eras of the 20th century, from the roaring '20s to World War II to the '60s and on to the present day, as the readers of the diary sit in a hospital in New Orleans on the eve of Hurricane Katrina. Fincher and Roth are really trying to tell the story of the 20th Century, but they don't seem to have a clear idea what they want to say about it, just that it happened and should be remembered. Which is something I suppose, but feels more than a little vague.

"The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" just isn't up to the bar it's set for itself, largely because of a screenplay that, for all its strengths, lacks focus. There's a lot to like about it (and a loooot to sit through to get to those moments), and on paper it sounds like it should be great. But it isn't. It's still worth your time, but you might want to wait for DVD where you can space out the viewing some.
'Read More......'atau,'Selengkapnya......'


Mau dapatkan artikel (berita/gambar/video), gossip & sensasi selebriti dan foto artis dari Gossip Blog SECARA PERCUMA / GRATIS setiap hari?
Daftarkan email anda [ di sini ]


Digg this




Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Movie Review: Transporter 3

Parah ini film ratingnya hanya 4.5. Hhmm, mending nanti gw download aja film ini ya.. sengihnampakgigi

Reviewed by: Joshua Starnes
Rating: 4.5 out of 10
Movie Details: View here

Cast:
Jason Statham as Frank Martin
Natalya Rudakova as Valentina
François Berléand as Tarconi
Robert Knepper as Johnson
Jeroen Krabbé as Leonid Vasilev
David Atrakchi as Malcom Manville
Yann Sundberg as Flag
Eriq Ebouaney as Ice
David Kammenos as Market Driver
Silvio Simac as Mighty Joe

Review:
Usually stuff like this gets mercifully relegated to the five dollar bin at Blockbuster or the 2 A.M. slot on HBO next to most recent Steven Seagal masterpiece. But "The Transporter" series has managed to gather enough of an audience for Lionsgate to inflict it on us every so often, and it looks like it's that time again.

Jason Statham stars again (and I use the Mystery Science Theater definition of 'starring' in that the camera is pointed at Jason Statham most of the time) as courier Frank Martin. The money must be pretty good because after his last two outings you'd think he might have retired considering how good the odds are of him being forced into doing some villains dirty work for them. But there'd be no movie otherwise, and he soon finds himself carting around a pair of duffel bags and a surly Ukrainian party girl (Natalya Rudakova) in a blackmail plot that's too dull to bother explaining. To make sure there's no funny business, he is forced to wear a device that will detonate if he gets more than fifty feet from the car.

Despite the fact that series originator Louis Letterier has moved on to greener pastures (replaced by the aptly named Olivier Megaton) everything about this "Transporter" is pretty much the same as the others. A lot of that can be laid at the feet of writer/producer Luc Besson. Besson is talented visual craftsman, but as a writer seems inflicted with a permanent case of arrested development. He's been recycling the same fifteen-year-old adolescent fantasy since "The Professional"; a beautiful young woman finds herself in a great deal of trouble, and must be saved by the superhero/everyman she has recently crossed paths with. Of course that sounds a little vague, but in experience the fingerprints of Besson on a production are immediately noticeable, especially in the look and screen personality of the female lead-as young as possible without quite being icky so that he can play up a mixture of innocence and sexuality. Besson has managed to make something out of this plot before, and he keeps trying variations on it, but a film getting only the writer half of his talents is being done no favors.

The beautiful young woman this time around is newcomer Natalya Rudakova, who I assume was picked for her looks, because every time she opens her mouth to speak I'm filled with an uncontrollable urge to beat my head against a wall. That may not entirely be her fault though; Besson and long-time writing partner Robert Mark Kamen have given her some of the worst dialogue I've heard, even by action movie standards.

The rest of it is about what you'd expect as well; car chases and the odd bit of kung fu from returning choreographer Corey Yuen, including one bit stuck inside a flashback during the film's opening exposition. It's horribly awkward to put it mildly. And much drabber than previous installments. Paris and Miami have been replaced by backwoods Hungary and Romania, which are probably a lot cheaper to film in, but one wooded road looks pretty much the same as any other. There is one cleverly done sequence where Frank's car is stolen and he must catch it before he explodes, but the others are imminently forgettable. And except for Frank jumping his car from one moving train to another, the all out lunacy of the last film has been jettisoned as well. Which is probably a good thing, but they've it replaced with a solemnity of purpose a film like "Transporter 3" is far too shallow to support. There's no need to go back to blowing up helicopters with handguns, but there must be some sort of middle ground.

Still, you know exactly what kind of movie this is. If that's your cup of tea, more power to you. You're going to get exactly what you expect out of it. And if it's not, don't bother.
'Read More......'atau,'Selengkapnya......'


Mau dapatkan artikel (berita/gambar/video), gossip & sensasi selebriti dan foto artis dari Gossip Blog SECARA PERCUMA / GRATIS setiap hari?
Daftarkan email anda [ di sini ]


Digg this




Saturday, November 29, 2008

Movie Review: Bolt

Guys mesti kita tonton nih film ini. Lihat aja 8 lol ratingnya..

Reviewed by: Scott Chitwood
Rating:
8 out of 10
Movie Details:
View here

Cast:
John Travolta as Bolt (voice)
Miley Cyrus as Penny (voice)
Susie Essman as Mittens (voice)
Mark Walton as Rhino (voice)
Malcolm McDowell as Dr. Calico (voice)
James Lipton as The Director (voice)
Greg Germann as The Agent (voice)
Diedrich Bader as Veteran Cat (voice)
Nick Swardson as Blake (voice)
J.P. Manoux as Tom (voice)
Dan Fogelman as Billy (voice)
Kari Wahlgren as Mindy (voice)
Chloe Moretz as Young Penny (voice)
Randy Savage as Thug (voice)
Ronn Moss as Dr. Forrester (voice)
Grey DeLisle as Penny's Mom (voice)
Sean Donnellan as Penny's TV Dad (voice)
Lino DiSalvo as Vinnie (voice)
Todd Cummings as Joey (voice)
Tim Mertens as Bobby (voice)
Kelly Hoover as Ester (voice)
Brian Stepanek as Martin (voice)
Jeff Bennett as Lloyd (voice)
Daran Norris as Louie (voice)
John Di Maggio as Saul (voice)

Summary:
"Bolt" is a pleasant surprise from Disney. With great character animation, hilarious jokes, cool action scenes, and a strong supporting cast, this is a movie that will not only entertain families but adult audiences as well. Definitely check it out in 3-D if you can.

Story:
Bolt is the world's greatest super-dog. He is incredibly fast, is super strong, has heat vision, and has a super bark. He uses his powers to save the world from the evil Dr. Calico. Bolt is also ever vigilant and protects his owner, Penny, from the forces of evil.

Too bad Bolt doesn't realize he's on a TV show and none of it is real.

When Bolt is accidentally separated from Penny, he's forced to make a cross-country journey to save his owner. The catch is he still thinks he has super powers. Bolt captures a cat prisoner named Mittens and forces her to lead him to where Penny is being held. Despite her protests, Mittens can't convince Bolt that he's just the star of a TV show. Matters aren't helped when a Bolt super-fanboy (and hamster in a ball) named Rhino joins them and further reinforces Bolt's delusions.

Will Bolt be reunited with Penny? And what will happen when Bolt realizes he's just a normal dog?

"Bolt" is rated PG for some mild action and peril.

What Worked:
I'll start out by saying that I saw this in 3-D and it was very cool. Any time you can see an animated film in 3-D, it instantly bumps it up a notch in the ratings for me. Not only is it a cool effect, but it gives you greater appreciation for the CG animation. When Bolt and Mittens are in the woods, every single plant and blade of grass pops off of the screen. When Rhino rolls around in his ball, you start noticing details like the transparency in the plastic. When Bolt is in a fire, the embers float off of the screen towards you. You just start noticing little details that you might never spot in a 2-D presentation. If you can see "Bolt" in 3-D, I recommend you do so.

I saw the "Bolt" presentation at the San Diego Comic Con, so I knew I was in for a treat. I was a little dismayed to find out they showed us a good portion of the movie at SDCC, but there was enough here to still keep me entertained. It was also fun to see my family discover it for the first time.

"Bolt" starts out as an action film as we're treated to the TV show world. Penny and Bolt are attacked by a variety of goons in helicopters, on motorcycles, and other stuff. The opening scene is as exciting and imaginative as anything in a James Bond flick. You start wondering, "How can they top this?" as Bolt is thrown into the real world. It's at this point that the movie switches gears and turns from action to comedy. Fortunately, the comedy is just as strong as the action.

I was impressed how practically every new character that was introduced along the way brought an entertaining piece to the story. A couple of cats (one voiced by Diedrich Bader) amusingly harass Bolt in his trailer. In New York, Bolt encounters a funny group of pigeons that are perfectly animated like real world pigeons. When we meet Mittens, her exasperation and dismay at Bolt's high levels of crazy brings a lot of laughs. But the real show stealer is the hamster Rhino who is voiced by Mark Walton. He brings the house down and the character's introduction alone takes the movie to another level. Rhino's uber-fanboy persona and can-do attitude is hilarious. How can you not crack up when a hamster in a ball does a maniacal laugh or offers to snap a man's neck? Rhino might be able to carry a movie on his own.

The supporting cast is so strong that Bolt is almost relegated to the role of straight man. John Travolta does a fine job as Bolt and gives the character a sympathetic and earnest tone. Miley Cyrus is also good as Penny, but she's not in the movie all that much. Where the two really shine is in the song they sing together in the closing credits. "I Thought I Lost You" features the teen pop starlet and the "Grease" superstar singing together in a nice duet that the two apparently actually wrote together. But as far as voice performances go, Susie Essman really stands out as Mittens. She's funny, sassy, and a great heroine. Essman really brings the character to life.

The animators do a really great job with the performances of the CG characters. A standout scene is when Mittens is teaching Bolt how to beg for food. By giving him little instructions here and there ("Ears down! Head tilted!"), Bolt goes from a neutral facial expression to an all out "I'm cute, feed me" look right before your eyes. That scene should be required viewing for any aspiring animator. The subtle touches with body motions and facial expressions are apparent through the rest of the film.

What Didn't Work:
The only times "Bolt" really stalled were whenever the film went 'Hollywood.' By that I mean scenes where the director goes on a long monologue about dog 'method acting' or any scene with Penny's slimy agent. Whenever the camera diverts away from the animals and onto the humans, the pacing seemed to slow down. Other than that I have no real complaints about "Bolt."

The Bottom Line:
"Bolt" was a fun film. I'd recommend it not just for families but anyone that enjoys comedies or animation. This is not just a kid's movie.
'Read More......'atau,'Selengkapnya......'


Mau dapatkan artikel (berita/gambar/video), gossip & sensasi selebriti dan foto artis dari Gossip Blog SECARA PERCUMA / GRATIS setiap hari?
Daftarkan email anda [ di sini ]


Digg this




Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Movie Review: Twilight

Hhmm, sayang film ini dapat review yang jelek sekali padahal gw pertamanya pengen nonton film ini. Ya mungkin banyak gossip yang jelek mulai dari pemainnya yang gay si Robert Pattinson, trus pemain wanitanya kurang cocok.

Reviewed by: Edward Douglas
Rating:
4.5 out of 10
Movie Details:
View here

Cast:
Kristen Stewart as Bella Swan
Robert Pattinson as Edward Cullen
Billy Burke as Charlie Swan
Ashley Greene as Alice Cullen
Nikki Reed as Rosalie Hale
Jackson Rathbone as Jasper Hale
Kellan Lutz as Emmet Cullen
Peter Facinelli as Dr. Carlisle Cullen
Cam Gigandet as James
Taylor Lautner as Jacob Black
Anna Kendrick as Jessica Stanley
Michael Welch as Mike Newton
Justin Chon as Eric Yorkie
Christian Serratos as Angela Weber
Gil Birmingham as Billy Black
Elizabeth Reaser as Esme Cullen
Edi Gathegi as Laurent
Rachelle Lefevre as Victoria
Sarah Clarke as Renee
Ned Bellamy as Waylon Forge
Gregory Tyree Boyce as Tyler
Matt Bushell as Phil
José Zúñiga as Mr. Molina

Directed by Catherine Hardwicke

Summary:
Essentially, a CW take on Anne Rice, catering to the gooey-eyed fans of Meyer's novels and their unrealistic romantic expectations.

Story:
After moving to Washington State to live with her police chief father, Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart) tries to adjust to a new high school and her exceedingly strange lab partner Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson), who seems to be turned off by her, but in fact, has a deep, dark secret… he's a vampire… who likes to play baseball.

Analysis:
Maybe I'm giving away my age or my gender or the fact I haven't read a single word that Stephenie Meyer has ever written either intentionally or by accident, so going to see this movie without any advance knowledge, even avoiding all trailers and clips, might not have been the best way to see it. (Maybe this reviewer is trying to learn from his experience with "Nick and Nora's Infinite Playlist.") If this movie is someone's first taste of Meyer's mediocre Harlequin vampire romance, one might be left somewhat mystified how it's been turned into such a global phenomenon, as enticing to women as catnip is to cats.

On the surface, there's very little difference between this and teen-minded dogs like "The Covenant" or "Blood and Chocolate" or even a less entertaining "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" with better production values. Yet any gleeful desire one might have to tear apart and analyze every aspect of the movie serves little purpose, because let's face it, nothing anyone can say or do could possibly convince the millions of women who've already bought their opening day tickets to ask for a refund.

The film's set-up is straight out of the pilot of far too many teen-oriented TV dramas. Kristen Stewart's Bella Swan moves to a new neighborhood and tries to make new friends on her first day of school at the denizens of a local high school. The weirdest clique at this school is the Cullen family, five sophisticated teens whom keep to themselves. When Bella first makes visual contact with Robert Pattinson's Edward Cullen, sparks immediately fly, but he pushes her away and tries to keep her at arm's length, much to Bella's annoyance. A freak accident puts Bella's life in danger and Edward miraculously saves her, and Bella starts to wonder if there's more to the strange boy than just his rude behavior, and she starts digging into the truth about Edward and his family. It'll take the next hour for her to figure things out… are the Cullens vampires or werewolves or aliens or are they just a weird incestuous family who wear too much pancake make-up, drive cool cars and act weird around others? By the time the "v" word is actually used, you wonder how no one else in town has figured it out by now.

The movie's biggest problem is that the two main actors don't have enough personality to keep the movie interesting. Stewart's slightly better in her "bored cool" monotonic delivery she's perfected, while Pattinson's strengths lies in his ability to brood and throw longing looks at his leading lady. Whomever thought Cedric Diggory could play a leading man like this one was surely going merely by his looks, which would be par for the course for a movie that's all surface with little depth. The two actors have very little chemistry, spending much of the movie acting awkward around each other, because after all, Edward can't be in love with a human; that would be like a guy falling in love with his juicy hamburger. No, these are immortal vampires sworn not to drink human blood, so instead they act strange, glitter like sparkle in the sunlight and play baseball in thunderstorms. Yes, you read that last part right.

The rest of the young cast aren't bad--it's certainly nice seeing indie up 'n' comers like Anna Kendrick and others being used well--but the movie bogs itself down with over-exposition, especially while following Bella's search for the truth about Edward. The bland writing does very little to keep one interested, though there are some funny bits involving Bella's male friends and their interest in her, plus Billy Burke does get some genuine laughs as her overprotective father, but otherwise, the humor is mostly inside jokes for the sake of those who read the books. Most of the movie is sooooo high school that after a while, one can't help feeling that director Catherine Hardwicke needs to stop playing with teens and start playing with people her own age.

It takes a good ninety minutes for the "bad vampires," the ones that act normal by killing and eating humans, to show up and face "Team Edward." Thankfully, we're spared an actual baseball game between the two factions and are given a passing introduction to James (Cam Cigandet), the bad guy who also sets his eye on Bella as the target for his desire to hunt and kill his food. It's just bad storytelling to wait so long to properly introduce such a major character and after Bella and Edward are chased across the country to escape, he's disposed of so easily, one wonders why even bother introducing any antagonist into the situation. Even so, that doesn't stop Hardwicke from setting up the next movie, which one can probably figure out by who's left standing.

One can give Hardwicke suitable credit for finding an excellent DP in Elliot Davis, who makes every shot look stunning, whether it's the panoramic vistas of Oregon (doubling for Washington) or the tight close-ups on the intensity of the two leads. It was also a smart decision hiring Carter Burwell to do the score, embellishing the film's soundtrack, which is certainly its strong suit, as you would expect from a movie trying to cater to the CW generation. The entire movie just relies too much on the slick commercial look of the movie rather than the quality of the performances or pacing of the storytelling, the latter possibly being faulted to their desire to be faithful to Meyer's source.

The movie's production values falter tragically when it comes to the action scenes, as few as there are, mostly done using sloppy wirework and poorly-executed time-lapsing FX to show Edward using his super-speed. It's embarrassing how bad the scenes look considering the money at Hardwicke's disposal, compared to Asian action films like "Kung Fu Hustle" which look amazing at a fraction of that cost. Fortunately, the women going to see this movie won't really care about that, as long as they get a scene of Bella and Edward swooning over each other afterwards. Actual fans of vampire movies looking for any amount of blood-rending terror will be thoroughly disappointed by the innocuous way the violence is handled in the movie.

What really worries me is that movies like this one (and Meyer's books) set up unrealistic expectations for young women about romance, while making it impossible for real guys to live up to the standards set by Edward, who is just ridiculously and incredulously perfect in every way. Even so, with all of the throbbing unconsummated sexual energy permeating the movie, one can probably expect teen pregnancy to explode in the coming months as girls try to find the romantic intimacy of Bella and Edward and spend the rest of their lives being disappointed by reality.

The Bottom Line:
As much as the movie works as a showcase for Hardwicke and her crew to create a movie that looks great, the problems of the source material and its weak pacing are hard to overcome with flashy visuals and music. As someone watching it without having read the books, it's hard to understand the appeal, but it doesn't really matter. If one really must see a vampire love story this weekend, they should skip this and go see "Let the Right One In."
'Read More......'atau,'Selengkapnya......'


Mau dapatkan artikel (berita/gambar/video), gossip & sensasi selebriti dan foto artis dari Gossip Blog SECARA PERCUMA / GRATIS setiap hari?
Daftarkan email anda [ di sini ]


Digg this




Sunday, November 9, 2008

Movie Review: Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa

Guys, film ini lucu lol lihat saja ratingnya 7.5. Mesti ditonton nih sama pacar atau istri tercinta Anda.

Reviewed by: Scott Chitwood
Rating:
7.5 out of 10
Movie Details:
View here

Cast:
Ben Stiller as Alex (voice)
Chris Rock as Marty / Additional Zebras (voice)
David Schwimmer as Melman (voice)
Jada Pinkett Smith as Gloria (voice)
Sacha Baron Cohen as Julien (voice)
Cedric the Entertainer as Maurice (voice)
Andy Richter as Mort (voice)
Bernie Mac as Zuba (voice)
Alec Baldwin as Makunga (voice)
Sherri Shepherd as Mom (voice)
Will i Am as Moto Moto (voice)
Elisa Gabrielli as Nana
Tom McGrath as Skipper / Lemur #1 (voice)
Chris Miller as Kowalski (voice)
Christopher Knights as Private (voice)

Summary:
"Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa" is a solid sequel and any family that enjoyed the first film will enjoy this.

Story:
Shortly after the events of "Madagascar," Alex, Marty, Melman, Gloria, and the penguins prepare to return to New York City on a patched-together airplane. The lemur king Julien and his right hand man Maurice go along for the ride, too. Along the way, the plane has some mechanical problems and they crash-land in the middle of Africa.

While the zoo animals are at first afraid of their new surroundings, they quickly realize it's the place they belong when they discover more of their own kind. Marty falls in with the zebra herd, Melman becomes a giraffe witch doctor, and Gloria falls in love with a sexy male hippo named Moto Moto. But most importantly, Alex is reunited with his mother and his father, Zuba.

Zuba is king of the pride and is overjoyed by the return of his son who was kidnapped by poachers years before. However, another lion named Makunga uses the happy reunion as an opportunity to win control of the pride and all the animals in the wildlife reserve. It's up to Alex and his friends to save the day and restore everything to normal in the savannah.

"Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa" is rated PG for some mild crude humor.

What Worked:
I enjoyed the first "Madagascar" film. It was fun, my family got a kick out of it, and we had a pleasant movie-going experience when seeing it. That being said, I wasn't exactly clamoring for a sequel. In fact, I went into this movie practically blind. The only thing I saw in advance was the trailer and the annoying "I Like to Move It" song wasn't really a selling point. So I was a bit surprised by how much I enjoyed the sequel.

The first movie covered the story of taking zoo animals and throwing them back into the wild. Fortunately, the creators found more ground to cover by dumping them in their homeland and introducing them to more animals like themselves. This offers up a lot funny directions to take the story as they experience reverse culture shock. Gloria is wooed by a fat, macho hippo. Marty deals with the fact that all zebras look alike (they don't take it as far as you might expect Rock to go in regards to race). And Alex learns the hard way what it's like to be a lion. In fact, the sequel ends up being a kiddie version of "Tropic Thunder" as the dancing superstar Alex is thrown into the harsh and violent real world while he mistakenly believes he's there to perform. Fortunately, it's still funny here.

All the characters that made the first movie so fun return in top form. The penguins steal the show again. However, Sacha Baron Cohen manages to top even the penguins as Julien. A scene where he teaches Melman how to win the heart of Gloria is one of the highlights of the film. But there are a few new characters that are fun, too. Bernie Mac has a bittersweet performance as Zuba, Alex's father. His exasperation at Alex is funny, but it's definitely a sad reminder that this talented actor is gone. I'm not a big fan of Alec Baldwin, but he was good as Makunga, the rival lion. I was really afraid when he appeared that this was going to be a parody of "The Lion King," but it never went in that direction despite having a lot of similar plot points.

I don't really think the animation did anything technologically groundbreaking here. What you'll find noteworthy are the performances of the characters. From silly motions to hilarious facial expressions, the animators did good work.

What Didn't Work:
While many of the fan favorites reappear in this sequel, there's one that should have been left behind this round – the Old lady. She appears again… and again… and again. It's funny at first. Who wouldn't laugh at an old lady beating up a lion? But it is run into the ground and by the end you wish she'd get eaten or something. It was overkill.

I'll also add that the opening scene where Alex is kidnapped from his father is a tad intense. Some younger kids might get freaked out by it. Be warned!

The Bottom Line:
If you and your family enjoyed the first "Madagascar" film, you'll enjoy this one. It has some great moments in it that thankfully aren't ruined by the ads. This one's worth checking out.
'Read More......'atau,'Selengkapnya......'


Mau dapatkan artikel (berita/gambar/video), gossip & sensasi selebriti dan foto artis dari Gossip Blog SECARA PERCUMA / GRATIS setiap hari?
Daftarkan email anda [ di sini ]


Digg this




Sunday, October 19, 2008

Movie Review: Max Payne

Waduh parah filmnya dikasih rating 3. Nanti kalau saya nonton film ini saya update ya guys!!!

Reviewed by: Edward Douglas
Rating:
3 out of 10
Movie Details:
View here

Cast:
Mark Wahlberg as Max Payne
Mila Kunis as Mona Sax
Beau Bridges as BB Hensley
Chris ‘Ludacris' Bridges as Jim Bravura
Chris O'Donnell as Jason Colvin
Donal Logue as Alex Balder
Amaury Nolasco as Jack Lupino
Kate Burton as Nicole Horne
Olga Kurylenko as Natasha
Rothaford Gray as Joe Salle
Joel Gordon as Owen Green
Jamie Hector as Lincoln DeNeuf
Andrew Friedman as Trevor
Marianthi Evans as Michelle Payne
Nelly Furtado as Christa Balder

Directed by John Moore

Summary:
It isn't just style over substance, but style over decent storytelling and filmmaking that makes "Max Payne" an embarrassment to a genre that's already delivered some of the worst movies of the last ten years.

Story:
After the murder of his wife and partner, Detective Max Payne (Mark Wahlberg) gets involved in a case involving a drug being manufactured by the Aesir Corporation where his wife used to work; as the bodies start piling up, Payne finds himself the target of gangsters, assassins and the police alike.

Analysis:
Even diehard gamers have learned from experience not to set their expectations too high when their favorite video games are ported to the big screen, because no matter how "cinematic" a video game may try to be, no matter how great the story or characters, they never work as movies. Fans of the 2002 game "Max Payne" may be hoping that the presence of a star like Mark Wahlberg or an established director like John Moore ("The Omen") might break the ugly impressions many people may already have about video game movies, having been responsible for the careers of directors Uwe Boll and Paul W.S. Anderson, but sadly, it's not to be.

The film opens with Payne in the icy waters of the river with bodies floating beneath him, but before we can wonder how he got there, we're in the police station where Wahlberg is working a desk job in the Cold Case department. He's sent on a lead to a party where he meets a Russian beauty named Natasha (of course)—played by Olga Kurylenko, who I pray is better in the new Bond movie. After Payne turns down her advances, she runs off, only to be ripped to shreds by winged creatures in an alley, all off-camera. Soon, Payne's former partner Alex (Donal Logue), who has a lead, also turns up dead and Payne starts looking into how they all tie together.

The most immediately noticeable thing about Moore's movie is the way he's taken the stylish look of the video game even further, creating a stark and moody movie that looks more like Frank Miller's "Sin City" with a snow-covered city that looks more like cardboard cut-outs than actual buildings. That may sound like a put down, but in fact, the amazing visual look of the movie is the only real thing going for it. As soon as one looks past the surface, the movie is a complete disaster.

Considering the amount of action in the original video game, one would imagine this movie would be just as exciting to watch. In fact, it's excruciatingly dull, piled high with exposition as Moore focuses on the moody noir aspects of the game with very little of the actual gameplay. Payne is essentially the same character, and Moore does try to capture the distinctive look and sounds of the gunfight scenes, but otherwise, the story has absolutely nothing to do with the game. Fans of the game might be particularly puzzled by the flying creatures from the trailers and commercials, and at the start of the film, we're led to believe those who take the mystery drug (all of whom have wing tattoos on their arms) turn into these creatures. In fact, these creatures are part of the visions of those who take Aesir's super soldier drug Valkyr. While the CG used to create them is okay, watching hoodlums take the juice and freak out with all these creatures flying around their heads is pretty silly the first time, but even worse when it happens to the protagonist.

Everything in this movie is taken far too seriously to be fun or enjoyable, and while the dialogue is almost as bad as "Doom," possibly worse, the acting is equally abysmal with Wahlberg only doing slightly better than usual pulling off a tough guy, spending most of the movie grimacing like the video game character. At least in this case, he is able to remain in character but it's such a lifeless performance that it does nothing to make you want to follow his story, as it continually flashes back to him finding his dead wife.

Mila Kunis' attempts to act tough as... well actually, I have no idea what her character Mona Sax was supposed to be. A DEA Agent? Some sort of assassin? It's all very unclear, but giving her a machine gun to wave around and trying to get her to act tough must have been the biggest challenge for Moore. Chris "Ludacris" Bridges isn't much better as an Infernal Affairs agent who also seems to serve very little purpose to the story, and one seriously has to wonder what the hell happened to Beau Bridges, once a decent actor who is terrible as Payne's long-time friend, a former police officer now working as the head of security at Aesir. His performance needs to be taken under serious consideration for this year's Supporting Actor Razzie, it's that bad. These are just three of the many characters who pop in and out of the movie with little explanation and offering very little to the story, although you'd think that with so much exposition, it would be a lot clearer who everyone is.

Maybe the filmmakers thought gamers watching this movie wouldn't care about the story or character development if they got lots of gunfight and bloodshed, but there isn't even enough of that to make up for it. Worse than anything else, the movie feels like it was butchered to get it down to a PG-13 rating, which is ridiculous considering the original video game's "M" rating. Having seen some of the unedited scenes at Comic-Con in San Diego and been floored by the brutality of the violence, one wonders why Fox felt the need to dilute and water down the movie to try to reach a larger audience, something that will actually make it less desirable and effective at winning over the game's fanbase.

Instead, "Max Payne" reminds one of Kurt Wimmer's "Ultraviolet," a cool-looking movie that got so caught up in its visuals it became oblivious to the fact that you need to have a decent script and performances if you want to sell the premise and make it feel even remotely plausible.

Bottom Line:
It's hard to imagine anyone involved with this movie didn't realize they were making a bad movie just from the script; maybe they were dazzled by the same moody, stylish visuals they expect to lull moviegoers into disregarding the terrible story and acting. (Or more likely, they were dazzled by the paycheck.) Unfortunately for them, most gamers have come to expect better storytelling and acting from their video games than this movie delivers.

(Incidentally, if you're really desperate for more Max Payne after sitting through this grueling experience, you can stay all the way through the end credits for one last scene. Sadly, it doesn't feature Robert Downey Jr. or Samuel L. Jackson.)

'Read More......'atau,'Selengkapnya......'


Mau dapatkan artikel (berita/gambar/video), gossip & sensasi selebriti dan foto artis dari Gossip Blog SECARA PERCUMA / GRATIS setiap hari?
Daftarkan email anda [ di sini ]


Digg this




Sunday, October 12, 2008

Movie Review: Eagle Eye

Aneh ya dikasih rating 5 doang film ini. Padahal film ini sejak 10menit pertama tegang terus lol, emang sih begitu tahu siapa perempuan misterius yang memberi perintah Shia LaBeouf, film ini sih rada bosen lol. GB kasih rating 7.5 of 10.


Reviewed by: Joshua Starnes
Rating:
5 out of 10
Movie Details:
View here

Cast:
Shia LaBeouf as Jerry Shaw
Michelle Monaghan as Rachel Holloman
Billy Bob Thornton as Agent Thomas Morgan
Rosario Dawson as Zoe Perez
Michael Chiklis as Defense Secretary Callister
Anthony Azizi as Ranim Khalid
Cameron Boyce as Sam Holloman
Anthony Mackie as Major William Bowman
William Sadler as William Shaw

Review:
I've seen worse movies than "Eagle Eye"--and recently--but it's been a while since I was this bored during one. It's got a few decent set pieces, even the worst of thrillers will usually have one or two, but I still spent the last twenty minutes looking at my watch more than the screen.

The newest thriller from J.J Abrams protégés Alex Kurtzman and Robert Orci ("Transformers," "Fringe") and journeyman director D.J. Caruso ("Disturbia"), "Eagle Eye" is textbook high concept filmmaking. Jerry Shaw (Shia LaBeouf) is a twenty-something slacker (Hollywood's favorite version of the ‘everyman' for at least fifteen years) who suddenly finds a great deal of money in his bank account, an even greater amount of weapons and explosives in his apartment, and a strange voice on his phone telling him to obey its instructions or else.

As premises go, it's pretty good, shallowly plot-oriented sure, but interesting enough to want to see where it goes. Unfortunately, it's also interesting enough to actually get the movie made, which usually means none of the rest of the story gets as much thought put into it. "Eagle Eye" is pretty textbook about that, too.

Jerry soon finds himself on the run from the FBI, transformed into an ad hoc secret agent by the voice on the phone. He's helped as he goes along by an unlikely cell of every day people in the same situation as himself, including single mom Rachel Holloman (Michelle Monaghan), whose son has also been threatened by the mysterious voice on the phone. It's the voice that the movies really about, a kind of aural stand-in for the dreaded ‘powers that be' that can assume control of your life in a heartbeat without giving you any say in the matter.

Jerry is the kind of person who has dodged responsibility his entire life, always choosing easy over difficult, only to find he's had that choice suddenly taken away from him. LaBeouf's been playing these kinds of laid back, fast-talking characters since he was an adolescent on the Disney Channel, and he has a tendency to fall back into that pattern often. It's too bad, because every once in a while he will actually do some acting instead of just role-playing. Most of the rest of the cast has the same problem though, which isn't entirely their fault. They do the best they can with what's been written, but when it's mostly exposition, there's not a lot to grab onto. Rosario Dawson tends to get the worst of that stick as the Air Force investigator tracking Jerry down. Only Billy Bob Thornton's FBI agent is able to rise above the morass, mainly due to Thornton's experience as an actor. It should be a clue to how much exposition they're ramming down people's throats, they needed two different detectives doing two different things to get through it all.

Movies like "Eagle Eye" aren't normally that interested in character development; they're interested in set pieces and keeping their audience on the edge of their seat. It's to LaBeouf and the filmmakers' credit that the climax is well keyed in on Jerry as a character, as he finally chooses to take responsibility for his life, to ‘do something.' It's better than I was expecting by that point frankly. Unfortunately, it was also too little, too late.

Films like this are ultimately all about, and only about, their plot and the plot for "Eagle Eye" is quite bad. Personally, I have a really hard time with any story starting with all of the electronic devices of the world – from computer-controlled cranes to traffic cameras – being taken over by one central authority. With just a little bit of thought, it's almost too impossible to suspend disbelief. To be fair, any story really only has to be internally consistent, not realistic. The electronic Big Brother routine is just the current magic wand for plot points (and to try and disguise authorial deus ex machina) because it's frequently in the air today but still vaguely understood enough that it can be easily rationalized. It's the same purpose electricity served at the turn of the century, or radiation in the fifties, turning people into giants or making them invisible instead of just killing them horribly. On the other hand, I always had trouble believing in those giant ants, too.

But that wouldn't be a deal breaker if the writers--all four of them--didn't insist on taking the lazy way out of every situation. Orci and Kurtzman writing style has always been heavily MacGuffin-based. They tend to exposit endlessly over whatever object their plot is revolving around rather than have anyone ever say anything meaningful, like what they think and feel about said object. Like a bad pop song, the hook is everything, and the rest of the story can go hang.

It's not a surprise then that the first film from their production company has the same problem. The writers seem to have spent all their time coming up with the various plot objects and teasing the audience with what they might be in their constant pursuit to keep people hooked, but without actually deciding for themselves what the objects are until they have to. The worst offender is a case Jerry and Rachel are forced to cart around for half the film. By the time the contents are revealed, the filmmakers seem to hope the audience is so caught up in the race to the finish that they don't stop to think about it, or else they'll realize the entire case and most of what has happened for the previous hour was a pointless digression used merely to eat up the clock.

Almost as bad is the revelation of who the voice on the phone actually is. I won't ruin it, but attentive viewers should figure it out in about 25 minutes, then spend the next half hour hoping they're wrong only to find out -- at the halfway mark when the whole plot is explained -- that it was unfortunately exactly what they thought it was. I don't particularly mind that kind of predictability even when it's supposed to be a twist; a lot of that's just a side effect of seeing so many movies. I do mind if it's stupid.

"Eagle Eye" isn't awful, just trite. There are two particularly silly but fun set pieces dealing with Jerry's escape from the FBI and a rogue Predator drone. They're not exactly worth the price of admission, but they keep it from being a total bust. Ultimately though, it suffers from the same problem most high concept films have; it's all smoke, but not enough fire.
'Read More......'atau,'Selengkapnya......'


Mau dapatkan artikel (berita/gambar/video), gossip & sensasi selebriti dan foto artis dari Gossip Blog SECARA PERCUMA / GRATIS setiap hari?
Daftarkan email anda [ di sini ]


Digg this




Movie Review: Body of Lies

Guys, ini ada review Body of Lies yang sedang ditayangkan di bioskop tercinta kita ( 21Cineplex, Blitz Megaplex & Platinum Screen ). Keren film ini, lihat saja ratingnya 8.5.


Reviewed by: Edward Douglas
Rating:
8.5 out of 10
Movie Details:
View here

Cast:
Leonardo DiCaprio as Roger Ferris
Russell Crowe as Ed Hoffman
Mark Strong as Hani Salaam
Golshifteh Farahani as Aisha
Oscar Isaac as Bassam
Ali Suliman as Omar Sadiki
Alon Abutbul as Al-Saleem
Vince Colosimo as Skip
Simon McBurney as Garland
Mehdi Nebbou as Nizar
Michael Gaston as Holiday
Kais Nashif as Mustafa Karami
Jamil Khoury as Marwan
Lubna Azabal as Aisha's Sister Cala

Directed by Ridley Scott

Summary:
As disturbing as it is compelling, Ridley Scott has outdone himself with his first modern-day political thriller, delivering his strongest movie since "Black Hawk Down."

Story:
Roger Ferris (Leonardo DiCaprio) is a CIA operative specializing in Middle East intelligence, finding the terrorists where they live under the command of Ed Hoffman, a cynical CIA veteran who willingly puts Ferris in danger while he sits comfortably back in Washington often making the wrong decisions. After their operation in Iraq goes South, Ferris is restationed in Jordan where he tries to build a relationship with the King's head of security Hani Salaam (Mark Strong) to infiltrate a terrorist faction stationed there which may lead them to their leader, Al-Saleem (Alon Abutbul).

Analysis:
At this point, true fans of filmmaker Ridley Scott will probably already assume that he can do no wrong, even when he takes a tangent into unfamiliar territory like romantic comedies or quirky character dramas. "Body of Lies" is further proof that he can handle any subject matter, this time tackling modern day real world espionage in a way that should appease fans of both his big movies and his subtle character work. Adapted by William Monahan ("The Departed") from the novel by David Ignatius, Scott's latest explores what our government is doing in the Middle East that doesn't involve soldiers and guns, instead showing the intelligence agents on the street trying to get information using subtler means by working with informants and agents to try and stay one step ahead of the terrorists.

After an apartment complex in Manchester is blown up in a police raid of a terrorist faction, CIA field agent Roger Ferris is in Iraq, using all his skills and connections to find Al-Saleem, the leader of the terrorists responsible for the bombing. He's working closely with his supervisor Ed Hoffman back in Washington, who continually does things that compromises Ferris' own plans. When one such operation ends badly, Ferris is seriously injured but instead of taking a desk job, he decides to follow another lead in Jordan, where he must start from scratch in making connections.

One might easily see the appeal of the movie in the sense that Roger Ferris is very much a real-world Jason Bourne, though this is a far more intellectual affair, dealing with the web of intrigue involved with finding the terrorists using agents in foreign credits. Even though the movie's Iraq sequence ends with a car chase and big explosions reminiscent of Scott's war scenes in "Black Hawk Down," the rest of the movie ends up being far more down-to-earth, excelling in the way it shows how the CIA gathers information and deals with the various people an agent might meet in the field. Ferris has everything at his disposal in trying to catch Al-Saleem to the point of setting up a false competing Jihadist organization using very clever methods. The results are similar to "Syriana" though far more focused by being more of a two-hander for two strong screen presences ala "American Gangster."

Pairing DiCaprio and Crowe is genius as the two mesh well with equally strong performances, DiCaprio continuing the mature roles he began when he started working with Scorsese, giving an incredibly convincing performance as the CIA operative. His Ferris is a well-rounded character with strong morals and convictions driving his every action, though the movie's more about how those are constantly compromised by his relationship with his superior Ed Hoffman, a character Crowe gives an extra sleazy demeanor with his heavy Southern drawl that makes it even harder to trust anything he says. Much of their interaction is on the phone, but there are a couple great scenes when they're on-screen together, and despite the serious subject matter, these scenes are very witty, particularly in the way Crowe allows Hoffman to be seen as somewhat buffoonish in his behavior, sort of like how the current administration is sometimes seen. One odd thing to note is how DiCaprio's character is rarely addressed by name, since for much of the movie he's referred to by Hoffman merely as "buddy." It's another minor thing that adds more realism to the set-up.

As much as the movie's about the tenuous relationship between Ferris and Hoffman, it's impossible not to take notice of Mark Strong as the Jordanian head of security Hanni Salaam, a scene-stealing performance in which the British actor holds his own up against Crowe and DiCaprio's great work. Wearing expensive Saville Row suits and calling everyone "my dear," Hanni is not one to be trifled with, and Ferris quickly learns how hard it is to gain his trust and even harder to keep it. Hanni's one condition of cooperating with Ferris' operation is that those he works with don't lie to him, something that's impossible for Hoffman, who'll do whatever it takes to get the information he wants, to the point of botching Ferris' operations and relationship with Hanni.

The one point where the movie falters slightly is when it starts showing Ferris' relationship with a local Muslim nurse, something that suddenly takes us out of the general tone set up in the movie previously. These lighter moments do show that Leo can pull off the charm even in a tough guy role like this, and the nurse does play a key role in the film's denouement, showing why field agents are unable to have private lives.

Even with the imperfect tangents, the film's script is nothing short of excellent, maybe one of the best of the year and certainly one that justifies Monaghan's Oscar. Likewise, it's hard not to be impressed by the amazing camerawork by Alexander Witt, a long-time Scott 2nd Unit Director who takes over the cinematography using a blend of normal techniques, mixed with CIA field cameras like the innovative Predator System, the proverbial "Eye in the Sky," which allows Scott to zoom back miles into the air to show the entire environment, an amazing achievement of filmmaking that will probably be lost on 90% of the audience who sees this, as Scott and Witt use this technology in an innovative way to make you see what Hoffman is seeing.

"Body of Lies" isn't the definitive final word on the subject of terrorism, being more of a cross-section of one CIA agent's experiences and how he's pushed to the limit from both sides of the war on terror. Parallels could certainly be drawn to last year's "Michael Clayton" in the way that Scott pulls this off in a riveting way that keeps you on your toes in terms of what's real, who is telling the truth and who can be trusted.

The Bottom Line:
Although this may not be the action-packed thriller some may be expecting from Ridley Scott at this point in his career, his unique take on the CIA's war on terror may be the strongest film to date to cover that subject matter.
'Read More......'atau,'Selengkapnya......'


Mau dapatkan artikel (berita/gambar/video), gossip & sensasi selebriti dan foto artis dari Gossip Blog SECARA PERCUMA / GRATIS setiap hari?
Daftarkan email anda [ di sini ]


Digg this




Search World Wide Web